Comments on: No, Digg, No! (no digg) http://blogwaffe.com/2006/02/27/no-digg-no-no-digg/ Witness the firepower of this fully armed and operational blog station Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:03:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: no digg dot net » The Best Way to Search Flickr http://blogwaffe.com/2006/02/27/no-digg-no-no-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-1753 no digg dot net » The Best Way to Search Flickr Mon, 01 May 2006 16:29:49 +0000 http://blogwaffe.com/2006/02/27/373/#comment-1753 [...] Mike has more on asanine digg comments here. [...] [...] Mike has more on asanine digg comments here. [...]

]]> By: Uber http://blogwaffe.com/2006/02/27/no-digg-no-no-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-1744 Uber Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:01:39 +0000 http://blogwaffe.com/2006/02/27/373/#comment-1744 The Internet makes you stupid. Slashdot and Digg both suffer in that the sort of people who offer opinions in comments are not required to know anything about anything, let alone something on a specific topic. The Internet makes you stupid. Slashdot and Digg both suffer in that the sort of people who offer opinions in comments are not required to know anything about anything, let alone something on a specific topic.

]]> By: HAA http://blogwaffe.com/2006/02/27/no-digg-no-no-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-1593 HAA Sat, 18 Mar 2006 21:05:04 +0000 http://blogwaffe.com/2006/02/27/373/#comment-1593 Digg helped me find the perfect iTunes smart playlist set for my listening needs: http://www.andybudd.com/archives/2005/08/itunes_smart_playlists/index.php. Too Cool. Digg helped me find the perfect iTunes smart playlist set for my listening needs: http://www.andybudd.com/archives/2005/08/itunes_smart_playlists/index.php.

Too Cool.

]]> By: gv http://blogwaffe.com/2006/02/27/no-digg-no-no-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-1569 gv Sun, 12 Mar 2006 23:58:30 +0000 http://blogwaffe.com/2006/02/27/373/#comment-1569 Let it here be recorded, the venerable site <a href="http://nodigg.net">"no digg dot net"</a> owes part of it's inspiration to this pivotal post Let it here be recorded, the venerable site “no digg dot net” owes part of it’s inspiration to this pivotal post

]]> By: MDA http://blogwaffe.com/2006/02/27/no-digg-no-no-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-1546 MDA Thu, 09 Mar 2006 18:36:37 +0000 http://blogwaffe.com/2006/02/27/373/#comment-1546 Such a system is implemented. I have chosen not to use it. Such a system is implemented. I have chosen not to use it.

]]> By: Adam http://blogwaffe.com/2006/02/27/no-digg-no-no-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-1515 Adam Thu, 02 Mar 2006 05:59:56 +0000 http://blogwaffe.com/2006/02/27/373/#comment-1515 Mike, I think this post is proof that you need to implement a system like Jeff, Paul, and Greg have that truncates long posts on the front page. You know, the whole "Read More" thing. Mike, I think this post is proof that you need to implement a system like Jeff, Paul, and Greg have that truncates long posts on the front page. You know, the whole “Read More” thing.

]]> By: MDA http://blogwaffe.com/2006/02/27/no-digg-no-no-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-1512 MDA Wed, 01 Mar 2006 18:48:05 +0000 http://blogwaffe.com/2006/02/27/373/#comment-1512 Ed, I have never run into such a problem. If you still have it (I'm guessing you don't), you can email it to me and I can make sure it works. Ed, I have never run into such a problem. If you still have it (I’m guessing you don’t), you can email it to me and I can make sure it works.

]]> By: Ed http://blogwaffe.com/2006/02/27/no-digg-no-no-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-1505 Ed Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:04:19 +0000 http://blogwaffe.com/2006/02/27/373/#comment-1505 I'm extremely upset that your blog won't let me post my absurdly long comment. I’m extremely upset that your blog won’t let me post my absurdly long comment.

]]> By: MDA http://blogwaffe.com/2006/02/27/no-digg-no-no-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-1504 MDA Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:06:16 +0000 http://blogwaffe.com/2006/02/27/373/#comment-1504 jjk, that is quite possibly the funniest thing this site has ever seen. jjk, that is quite possibly the funniest thing this site has ever seen.

]]> By: Adam http://blogwaffe.com/2006/02/27/no-digg-no-no-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-1503 Adam Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:29:07 +0000 http://blogwaffe.com/2006/02/27/373/#comment-1503 Off topic, but this was an actual conversation between my boss and some others (which Dixie might correct me on somewhat. I'm gonna paraphrase): (Background, we've been having a lot of kind-of-but-not-really-scheduled subgroup meetings recently.) ***** Dixie: "So, what time are we going to meet next weekend? Morning? Afternoon? Lunch? Saturday? Sunday? It would be helpful to know before the next meeting actually starts." Boss: "What?! You want me to plan things a week in advance?!" Someone Else: "Well Bill, it makes us kind of edgy when we don't know where you are at all times." Everyone: (general agreement + roaring laughter) ***** Anyway, we all thought it was funny. And to his credit, he sent out the email about the next meeting about 6 days in advance, rather than 6 hours, or (as sometimes happens) 6 minutes. Off topic, but this was an actual conversation between my boss and some others (which Dixie might correct me on somewhat. I’m gonna paraphrase):

(Background, we’ve been having a lot of kind-of-but-not-really-scheduled subgroup meetings recently.)

*****

Dixie: “So, what time are we going to meet next weekend? Morning? Afternoon? Lunch? Saturday? Sunday? It would be helpful to know before the next meeting actually starts.”

Boss: “What?! You want me to plan things a week in advance?!”

Someone Else: “Well Bill, it makes us kind of edgy when we don’t know where you are at all times.”

Everyone: (general agreement + roaring laughter)

*****

Anyway, we all thought it was funny. And to his credit, he sent out the email about the next meeting about 6 days in advance, rather than 6 hours, or (as sometimes happens) 6 minutes.

]]>