<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just what I needed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogwaffe.com/2005/02/26/239/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogwaffe.com/2005/02/26/239/</link>
	<description>Witness the firepower of this fully armed and operational blog station</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: tisiwoota  :: Brave New Words :: March :: 2005</title>
		<link>http://blogwaffe.com/2005/02/26/239/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>tisiwoota  :: Brave New Words :: March :: 2005</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2005 03:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogwaffe.com:8000/2005/02/25/239/#comment-421</guid>
		<description>[...] tube babies&#8217;, or even ah, eating shrimp [credit:MDA]).  Nonetheless, it seems pretty much like that&#8217;s the measure we&#8217;re stuck with, sin [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tube babies&#8217;, or even ah, eating shrimp [credit:MDA]).  Nonetheless, it seems pretty much like that&#8217;s the measure we&#8217;re stuck with, sin [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MDA</title>
		<link>http://blogwaffe.com/2005/02/26/239/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>MDA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 22:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogwaffe.com:8000/2005/02/25/239/#comment-303</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the links.  I remember a documentary about macaques on, I think, the discovery channel many years ago.  As I recall, the terms used were "penis fencing" and "genital-genital (GG) rubbing".

I always think it's interesting when well documented, reproducible science is completely disregarded (by anyone, including competing scientists).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the links.  I remember a documentary about macaques on, I think, the discovery channel many years ago.  As I recall, the terms used were &#8220;penis fencing&#8221; and &#8220;genital-genital (GG) rubbing&#8221;.</p>
<p>I always think it&#8217;s interesting when well documented, reproducible science is completely disregarded (by anyone, including competing scientists).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurel</title>
		<link>http://blogwaffe.com/2005/02/26/239/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2005 14:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogwaffe.com:8000/2005/02/25/239/#comment-302</guid>
		<description>Actually, the second-part of the Nigerian Anglicans' comment is off the mark too.  I don't know about dogs, cows and lions, but there's actually quite a lot of documented evidence of homosexuality in the animal kingdom-- from &lt;a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn3008" rel="nofollow"&gt;
gay sheep&lt;/a&gt; to (don't get too excited now) &lt;a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg16321985.000" rel="nofollow"&gt;lesbian primates&lt;/a&gt;.  Now some of this is just behavioral dalliance by animals that are "really" straight and will ultimately pair up heterosexually to reproduce, but in the meantime are, ah, experimenting a bit, often to strengthen social bonds in the group. So that's more like bisexuality. But some animals really are gay, that is, exclusively preferring members of their own sex.

Anyway, there's some interesting research going on to address the nature/nurture question in regards to homosexuality, including some interesting hypotheses about how to explain how the trait has persisted in the face of natural selective pressure seeming to be obviously against it. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the second-part of the Nigerian Anglicans&#8217; comment is off the mark too.  I don&#8217;t know about dogs, cows and lions, but there&#8217;s actually quite a lot of documented evidence of homosexuality in the animal kingdom&#8211; from <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn3008" rel="nofollow"><br />
gay sheep</a> to (don&#8217;t get too excited now) <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg16321985.000" rel="nofollow">lesbian primates</a>.  Now some of this is just behavioral dalliance by animals that are &#8220;really&#8221; straight and will ultimately pair up heterosexually to reproduce, but in the meantime are, ah, experimenting a bit, often to strengthen social bonds in the group. So that&#8217;s more like bisexuality. But some animals really are gay, that is, exclusively preferring members of their own sex.</p>
<p>Anyway, there&#8217;s some interesting research going on to address the nature/nurture question in regards to homosexuality, including some interesting hypotheses about how to explain how the trait has persisted in the face of natural selective pressure seeming to be obviously against it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MDA</title>
		<link>http://blogwaffe.com/2005/02/26/239/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>MDA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 23:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogwaffe.com:8000/2005/02/25/239/#comment-254</guid>
		<description>Dad sent me a good link regarding the &lt;a href="http://www.anglicancommunion.org/acns/articles/39/00/acns3949.cfm"&gt;Anglican Consultative Council&lt;/a&gt; which itself links to some informative information.

UPDATE:  and a link to &lt;a href="http://anglicansonline.org/"&gt;Anglicans Online&lt;/a&gt; [with the article in question &lt;a href="http://morgue.anglicansonline.org/050227/"&gt;archived here&lt;/a&gt;].  Likely a bit on the religious side for some, but worth the read anyway.  It quotes some very wise people and puts things into perspective a bit.

I should also point out that, though I disagree strongly with what appears to be the majority opinion among the Primates and perhaps of the Anglican world as a whole, most of those on the other side of the issue are not nearly so acid tounged as Primate Akinola.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dad sent me a good link regarding the <a href="http://www.anglicancommunion.org/acns/articles/39/00/acns3949.cfm">Anglican Consultative Council</a> which itself links to some informative information.</p>
<p>UPDATE:  and a link to <a href="http://anglicansonline.org/">Anglicans Online</a> [with the article in question <a href="http://morgue.anglicansonline.org/050227/">archived here</a>].  Likely a bit on the religious side for some, but worth the read anyway.  It quotes some very wise people and puts things into perspective a bit.</p>
<p>I should also point out that, though I disagree strongly with what appears to be the majority opinion among the Primates and perhaps of the Anglican world as a whole, most of those on the other side of the issue are not nearly so acid tounged as Primate Akinola.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.200 seconds -->
